Bill of Rights - 10th Ammendment

• The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution,
  • nor prohibited by it to the States,
    • are reserved to the States respectively,
    • or to the people.

Notes

This Amendment clearly explains what is true
-- the Federal government has only limited powers given under the Constitution by the people and the States;
only certain numbered and limited powers. All other government powers are to be kept by the States and citizens. The people and the States were fearful that the Federal government would try to seize more powers by fraud and that this amendment would help prevent violation of the Constitution and RIGHTS of the people and the States.

Under our Constitution, it is We The People who are sovereign. The people have the final say.

Quotations

IS YOUR FREEDOM IN DANGER?

(The Destruction of the Bill of Rights)
By Jarret Wollstein
Excerpt from the above pamphlet

Power has shifted from the individual to the state, and from the states to the federal government. Federal aid to states has meant federal control of States. By including the entire economy under "interstate commerce", the Supreme Court has given the Federal Government control over every aspect of society.

The State of the Patriot Movement

Lee Crites, Chairman
Used as the Keynote Address, 14 May 94
Independent American Party, Utah State Convention

The Tenth Amendment -- powers not delegated to the United States belong to the State or the People. Note for just a moment the use of the word "delegated" here. This states unequivocally that the powers that the Federal government has are given ("delegated") to it by the states -- that it is strictly an agent for the various states -- from the powers that the State already has.

This particular amendment has been trodden down in several subtle ways. First off, the feds know that they do not have the authority to legislate in most of the areas that they are currently meddling in. So they extort monies from the tax payers and then blackmail the states into 'voluntary' compliance with the legislation with that money. 'Extort?' 'Blackmail?' Aren't those words just a little harsh? Nope.

Extortion means two things. First, to take from by force or compulsion. We are told that our income taxes are voluntary, but in reality, we know that this is not the case. Second, extortion means the extraction of too high a price. In other words, we are forced to pay more than we need to for something -- normally at the risk of physical harm. If the federal government has enough extra money to be able to hold it over the heads of the states, then they have obviously extracted more money from us than they needed, causing us to pay too high a price, under the threat of law, for our government, therefore, they have extorted that money.

Blackmail is when you force a person, or entity, to do something against their will, using the threat of exposure or harm as the weapon. This is exactly how the federal government is making the states comply with their programs that are unconstitutional, at best.

I am not talking about if we SHOULD be paying federal taxes. That is a totally different matter. What I am simply saying here is that since we ARE paying them, we are paying too much, and the federal government is using that extorted money against us.

Another example of how the Federal Government is overtaking the powers of the states is with the local state Militia and National Guard organizations. In 1986, a dozen states, including Minnesota, refused permission for their state units to be sent to Honduras for a training mission. A federal judge denied the states this authority and ordered to troops to leave. This federal mandate has been used to prove that the federal government has control over the deployment of the state Guard, and not the state itself.

Moving onto another area, the elitists, no matter what name you might want to call them, The Illuminati, the CFR/TC, the Round Table Group, whatever, have become so confident that they are going to win, that they are bold enough to come right out and TELL us what they are doing. That is how sure that they are of victory.

It wasn't always this way. In June 1991, in Baden Baden, Germany, of the Bilderbergers, David Rockefeller said:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discression for almost forty years."

Why did he want secrecy? Again, from Mr. Rockefeller's own words:

"It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years."

So, why the change? In his book "Tragedy and Hope," Dr. Quigley, long time worker with this group, which he called the Round Table Group, said:

"...but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known."

They are now sure enough of their final victory, and that the patriot movement building in the United States today will not be able to mount a counter-attack, that they are starting to be quite open.

The NewStates Constitution, developed by the Rockefeller Foundation as a replacement for our own Constitution is readily available. It makes for frightening reading to any patriot, or any person, for that matter, who loves freedom. It is what will be submitted as the new constitution if, and when, there are 38 states that call for a Constitutional Convention. At the time of this writing, there are 36 states who have made this call, with several states that are considering making that call. Of course, there are several states who are trying to rescind their call as well. We will have to see what happens.

They are completely sure that they have won.

One last point here, though. It pertains to our police. Gary Benoit put the whole thing quite simply when he said:

"...the kind of government a country has can be determined just by the attitude the citizens have toward their police: In a free society the police are viewed as friends while in a totalitarian society they are greatly feared."

How do you feel about the police? How about the BATF? The FBI? CIA? IRS? Justice Department?

This is of tremendous significance, and is becoming more so, as the Multi-Jurisdictional Police Force starts to become a reality, which will merge all of these organizations together.

There are other issues involving State and National Sovereignty that could be brought up as well, mostly including the rapid acquisition of the United States by the United Nations, but it is time to move onto other topics.

Suffice it to say that the enemy is well organized, has a intricate and comprehensive plan, and is very, Very, VERY well funded, and they are ready to do whatever it takes.

And we are not. We hope to, we wish we did, we'd like to have, but we don't.